ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 13 Feb 14, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade her general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s requests, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. On 22 Mar 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration based on clemency. As new evidence, she submits a three-page typed statement outlining her life since leaving the military. She includes a photocopy of a photograph of her three children; all whom she states are officers in the U.S. military. Additionally, she includes a copy of her resume, Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration, various certificates, and copies of college transcripts. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the supporting documents provided by the applicant, we remain unconvinced that any relief is warranted. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting relief on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01764 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit D. Record of Proceedings, dated 25 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Mar 14, w/atchs. 2